Court Orders Fresh Review of Rejected Claims; Victims Allowed to Resubmit Original Investment Proof
A special court has directed the Competent Authority to reconsider thousands of rejected claims filed by victims of the Injaz, Aala and Muzaribah investment schemes—provided they now submit original, verifiable proof of their investments. The order is being widely viewed as a crucial step toward ensuring that only legitimate investors receive refunds while preventing fraudulent or unsupported claims.
Court Directs Re-Evaluation of Rejected Claims
According to the order, many claimants had earlier received rejection letters stating that the documents they submitted—primarily photocopies or incomplete papers—were not acceptable as valid proof of investment. This had resulted in widespread concern among genuine investors who feared losing their money despite having participated in the schemes.
The court has now clarified that original investment documents, including cash receipts, bond agreements and bank statements, must be accepted for verification. If submitted within the stipulated timeframe, the Competent Authority is obligated to reassess the claims.
“This order gives new hope to genuine victims who were denied refunds due to technical document-related issues,” said activist Narendra Kumar, who has been assisting several affected investors.
Media Updates: +91-93531 21474 [WhatsApp] | indianowme@gmail.com
Key Quotes
“If a victim possesses genuine investment proof and valid ID, no authority has the right to deny their refund.” — Narendra Kumar
“This order restores hope for thousands who were rejected not because they were wrong, but because the paperwork system failed them.”
“The court has made it clear: only those with original proof will be refunded—and no fraudulent claim will slip through.”
“For many victims, this is not just a legal order; it is the first ray of justice after years of uncertainty.”
“Administrative errors should not destroy the savings of honest people. The court’s direction protects both fairness and accountability.”
“If someone’s claim was wrongly rejected, the court door is open. With proper documents, justice is now within reach.”
“This ruling ensures that genuine investors are safeguarded while blocking any attempt at false or bogus claims.”
