Supreme Court’s Landmark Order in Muda Case: A Blow to Misuse of Probe Agencies, Says Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan
Bangalore: In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court has dismissed a plea seeking a probe against Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s wife, Parvathi, in the alleged Muda land allotment case. The ruling has drawn sharp reactions from state Housing and Minority Welfare Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan, who accused the Central government of misusing investigative agencies to target political opponents.
A Stern Message Against Misuse of Power
Khan hailed the Supreme Court’s decision as a “historic order” that exposes the Centre’s alleged exploitation of central agencies. “The court has delivered a strong lesson to the Central government, which misused the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to tarnish the reputation of a leader like Siddaramaiah, known for his clean and principled politics,” he said.
The minister emphasized that the verdict reaffirms the principle of ‘Satyameva Jayate’ (Truth alone triumphs). “This judgment is a slap on the faces of those who unnecessarily dragged the Chief Minister’s family into a case without evidence,” Khan stated.
Political Vendetta or Accountability?
The controversy stems from allegations of irregularities in the allotment of land under the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA). While opposition parties, including the BJP and JD(S), had demanded an investigation, the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the plea has shifted the narrative.
Khan criticized the BJP and JD(S) leaders, urging them to “apologize to the people of the country” and focus on constructive politics. “Instead of indulging in baseless accusations, they should join hands in the state’s development and seek redemption,” he asserted.
A Victory for Clean Governance?
The ruling has been perceived as a moral victory for Siddaramaiah’s administration, which has often positioned itself as a proponent of transparent governance. Khan reiterated that the Chief Minister’s family faced undue harassment due to politically motivated complaints.
“The court’s order has exposed those who misuse institutions for personal vendettas,” he said. “It is a reminder that truth ultimately prevails.”
What Next?
With the legal hurdle cleared, the focus now shifts back to governance. However, the political fallout from this verdict may intensify debates on the alleged weaponization of central agencies ahead of elections.
As the dust settles, Khan’s message to the opposition is clear: “Stop exploiting investigative tools for political gains and work for the people.”
The Supreme Court’s decision not only closes a contentious chapter but also reignites discussions on the ethical use of investigative powers in India’s democracy.
Key Quotes of Zameer Ahmed Khan:
-
“The Supreme Court has given a strong lesson to the Centre—misusing agencies for political revenge won’t work.”
-
“Satyameva Jayate stands proven again. Those who harassed the CM’s family without evidence face humiliation.”
-
“BJP & JD(S) leaders should apologize to the people and focus on development, not conspiracies.”
-
“This verdict is a victory for clean governance and exposes those who weaponize investigations.”
