BengaluruEducationKarnataka

50 Lakh Signatures and a Sea of Students Demand Karnataka U-Turn on School Closures

“A Conspiracy to Shirk Responsibility”: Students Submit 50 Lakh Signatures Against School Closures in Karnataka 

Bengaluru – In an unprecedented display of youth activism, the All India Democratic Students’ Organisation (AIDSO) on Thursday delivered a powerful rebuke to the Karnataka government, submitting a mammoth petition of 50 lakh signatures demanding a halt to the proposed closure of 6,200 state-run schools. The culmination of a six-month statewide campaign at Freedom Park saw thousands of students, activists, and academics unite to decry the systematic neglect of public education, framing the government’s consolidation policy as an assault on the rights of the poor.

The event, inaugurated by retired Supreme Court Justice and former Lokayukta Justice N. Santosh Hegde, transcended a mere protest. It served as a stark audit of the crumbling infrastructure, chronic teacher shortages, and a deepening crisis in Karnataka’s education system. Yet, it also morphed into a cautious victory lap. Leaders announced that sustained pressure from their movement had forced Education Minister Madhu Bangarappa to declare in the legislative assembly that no schools would be shut down. However, the mood was one of vigilant determination rather than celebration, with speakers vowing to continue their agitation until the verbal assurance is formalized in policy.

A Conspiracy Against the Poor: Academics Decry Policy Shift

The intellectual heft of the movement was underscored by scathing critiques from eminent academics. Prof. A. Murigeppa, former Vice-Chancellor of Hampi Kannada University, launched a direct attack on the government’s intent. “The government is favoring private schools and offloading its burden by closing government schools. This is ruining the future of children from poor families. This is a conspiracy by the government to shirk its responsibility,” he stated, voicing a sentiment that resonated through the crowd.

He dismantled the government’s primary justification—low enrollment—arguing that it creates a vicious cycle. “If government schools are closed on the pretext of low enrollment, it will be impossible for the children of ordinary people—who struggle to even afford one meal a day—to attend private schools,” he said, highlighting the socio-economic barrier. He redefined the government’s duty, insisting it must not close schools but instead resolve the core issues of teacher vacancies and infrastructure decay to naturally boost enrollment.

“ಜವಾಬ್ದಾರಿ ತಪ್ಪಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಲು ಸರ್ಕಾರದ ಷಡ್ಯಂತ್ರ”: ಶಾಲೆಗಳನ್ನು ಮುಚ್ಚುವುದರ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿಗಳು 50 ಲಕ್ಷ ಸಹಿಗಳನ್ನು ಸಮರ್ಪಿಸಿದರು.

Sabotage and Solidarity: Students Overcome Hurdles

The path to Freedom Park was fraught with obstacles, as detailed by AIDSO’s State Secretary, Ajay Kamath. He alleged active efforts by authorities to suppress the protest, claiming, “In many places, teachers were used to prevent students from coming to the event. Sudden tests were conducted in many schools and colleges, and parents were intimidated to prevent them from sending their children.” He framed the students’ successful mobilization as an act of defiance, proclaiming that those who reached the venue “overcame all these obstacles… proving they are the true followers of Netaji and Bhagat Singh.”

This narrative of resistance was woven into a broader historical tapestry. Kamath invoked the legacy of Indian educational reformers like Jyotiba Phule, Savitribai Phule, and Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar, stating their vision was the “inspiration and strength of this movement.” He called for a continued struggle to strengthen government schools as the “true tribute to these great personalities.”

Contact For Media Updates: +91-93531 21474 [WhatsApp] | indianowme@gmail.com

From Grassroots Grievances to a National Movement

The rally was not just about policy; it was about people. Personal testimonies gave a human face to the statistical crisis. Vikram, a 9th-standard student from Yadgir, shared a ground-level perspective of neglect. “We have come here to save government schools… The government schools have been neglected,” he said. His concerns were elemental: “There are inadequate bathroom facilities… Children have to go outside for certain activities, which causes concern among parents about their safety.” These concerns were validated by AIDSO’s Gangaraju, who pointed to a systemic failure: “There are around 61 thousand vacancies of teachers which need to be filled by the Government.”

The movement’s resonance extended beyond Karnataka’s borders. Sebastian, AIDSO Tamil Nadu State President, congratulated the Karnataka unit, declaring their fight “a model for the country.” He expressed anger that governments are “spreading unscientific thoughts that hinder scientific thinking in education and suppress the questioning mindset of students,” framing the school closure issue as part of a larger battle against “ignorance.”

“ನಮ್ಮ ಶಾಲೆಗಳನ್ನು ಉಳಿಸಲು ನಾವು ಇಲ್ಲಿಗೆ ಬಂದಿದ್ದೇವೆ”: ನಿರ್ಲಕ್ಷ್ಯದ ವಿರುದ್ಧ ಪ್ರತಿಭಟಿಸಲು ತಡೆಗಳನ್ನು ದಾಟಿದ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ವಿದ್ಯಾರ್ಥಿಗಳು.

A Cautious Victory and the Road Ahead

The political impact of the campaign was undeniable. AIDSO Central Council Secretary Shibasish Praharaj placed the Karnataka struggle in a national context, noting that all governments have been “commercializing education.” He hailed the education minister’s statement as a “victory for the students’ struggle in the state,” but swiftly cautioned against complacency, noting that thousands of institutions nationwide still suffer from a lack of infrastructure and teachers.

Echoing this vigilant stance, State President Ashwini K.S. called the signature campaign “historic” but issued a clear warning: “Do not abandon the struggle by trusting this assurance.” She demanded the official withdrawal of the government order facilitating mergers under the ‘Hub and Spoke’ model, signaling that the movement’s demands are specific and non-negotiable.

“ಇದು ಹೋರಾಟದ ವಿಜಯ”: ಮಂತ್ರಿಯ ತಿರುಮುಖದ ನಡುವೆ, ಶಿಕ್ಷಣಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಹೋರಾಟವನ್ನು ಮುಂದುವರೆಸಲು ಕಾರ್ಯಕರ್ತರ ಪ್ರತಿಜ್ಞೆ.

The formal act of submission saw Smt. Anita Nazare, Director of the Primary Education Department, accept the 50 lakh signatures and a detailed memorandum on behalf of the government. This physical handover symbolized a citizen’s audit being officially received by the state.

The mammoth gathering at Freedom Park, supported by messages from figures like writer Prof. Dr. Baraguru Ramachandrappa and actor Kishore, sent an unequivocal message. The students of Karnataka have not only forced a political concession but have also shifted the narrative. The question is no longer about how to close schools, but how to save, fund, and strengthen them. The ball is now in the government’s court to translate this massive public mandate into concrete, transformative action.

Quotes from AIDSO Leadership and Dignitaries

Prof. A. Murigeppa, Former Vice-Chancellor of Hampi Kannada University

  • “The government is favoring private schools and offloading its burden by closing government schools. This is ruining the future of children from poor families.”

  • “This is a conspiracy by the government to shirk its responsibility.”

  • “The only student organization in the state that has built a strong movement against this, by collecting 50 lakh signatures, is AIDSO.”

  • “If government schools are closed on the pretext of low enrollment, it will be impossible for the children of ordinary people—who struggle to even afford one meal a day—to attend private schools.”

  • “[The] government’s primary duty should be to resolve the lack of teachers and basic infrastructure that government schools face and thereby increase enrollment.”

Ajay Kamath, AIDSO State Secretary

  • “In many places, teachers were used to prevent students from coming to the event. Sudden tests were conducted in many schools and colleges, and parents were intimidated to prevent them from sending their children to Freedom Park.”

  • “Students overcame all these obstacles to rush to this protest, proving they are the true followers of Netaji and Bhagat Singh.”

  • “The thoughts of Jyotiba Phule, Savitribai Phule, Kudmul Rangaraya, and Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar—who strived for every child in this country to receive an education—are the inspiration and strength of this movement.”

Ashwini K.S., AIDSO State President

  • “The 50 lakh people who gave their signatures have supported the students and sent them to the event.”

  • She called the students’ work to save government schools “historic.”

  • “Due to the pressure of the movement built by AIDSO across the state, Education Minister Madhu Bangarappa has stated in the assembly that no schools will be closed.”

  • “Do not abandon the struggle by trusting this assurance.”

  • She demanded that the government “officially withdraw the order to merge schools under the name of ‘Hub and Spoke.'”

Shibasish Praharaj, AIDSO Central Council Secretary

  • “All central and state governments since independence have been commercializing education.”

  • “AIDSO is fighting against these anti-people policies of the governments across the country.”

  • “As a result of the struggle… the Education Minister of Karnataka has today stated that not a single government school will be closed. This is a victory for the students’ struggle in the state.”

  • “Even today, thousands of government educational institutions in Karnataka and across the country are suffering from a lack of basic infrastructure and teachers.”

Sebastian, AIDSO Tamil Nadu State President

  • Expressed anger that “governments, through their policies, are spreading unscientific thoughts that hinder scientific thinking in education and suppress the questioning mindset of students.”

  • “Their struggle against the conspiracy to close schools and push civilization into ignorance is a model for the country.”

    “We Have Come to Save Our Schools”: Karnataka Students Overcome Hurdles to Protest Neglect.

Quotes from Student Activists

Gangaraju, AIDSO State Secretary

  • “There are around 61 thousand vacancies of teachers which need to be filled by the Government.”

Vikram, 9th Standard Student from Yadgir

  • “We have come here to save government schools… The government schools have been neglected.”

  • “There are inadequate bathroom facilities… Children have to go outside for certain activities, which causes concern among parents about their safety.”

Prakruti, Student Activist

  • “The movement calls for a scientific, secular, and democratic education system for all.”

Tulsi, Student Activist

  • “The government plans to shut down 6200 schools due to low student numbers. Instead of closing them, they must improve facilities.”

Hanumesh, AIDSO Activist

  • “After the announcement of the agitation by AIDSO at Freedom Park, the department issued an order imposing a ban on student participation in external events. This is highly condemnable.”

10 Key Q&As: The Fight to Save Karnataka’s Government Schools

1. Q: What was the primary goal of the AIDSO protest in Bengaluru?
A: The primary goal was to forcefully demand that the Karnataka state government abandon its proposal to close approximately 6,200 government schools and instead commit to strengthening the public education system by addressing critical issues like teacher vacancies and crumbling infrastructure.

2. Q: How did the protesters demonstrate public support for their cause?
A: They demonstrated massive public support by collecting and submitting a petition containing a staggering 50 lakh (5 million) signatures from citizens across the state, gathered over a six-month-long campaign.

3. Q: What is the government’s main justification for closing schools, and how do critics counter it?
A: The government cites low student enrollment as the main reason for consolidation. Critics, like Prof. A. Murigeppa, counter that closing schools is a “conspiracy to shirk responsibility” and that the government’s duty is to improve these schools—by hiring teachers and upgrading facilities—to naturally attract more students, rather than punishing them for its own failure to invest.

4. Q: What are the most critical infrastructure problems highlighted by the students?
A: Students cited a range of severe problems, including:

  • Inadequate bathroom facilities, forcing children to go outside.

  • A lack of basic necessities like consistent water and electricity.

  • Structurally unsafe buildings, evidenced by a recent school collapse in Ballari that injured students.

5. Q: How significant is the teacher shortage in Karnataka’s government schools?
A: The shortage is catastrophic. According to AIDSO State Secretary Gangaraju, there are approximately 61,000 vacant teaching positions that the government has failed to fill, severely compromising the quality of education.

6. Q: Was the protest met with any opposition from authorities?
A: Yes. AIDSO leaders alleged active sabotage. State Secretary Ajay Kamath claimed that in many areas, authorities used tactics like suddenly scheduling exams, intimidating parents, and instructing teachers to prevent students from attending the protest to suppress participation.

7. Q: Did the protest yield any immediate results or concessions from the government?
A: Yes. Due to the immense pressure from the movement, Education Minister Madhu Bangarappa stated in the legislative assembly that no schools would be closed. Protest leaders hailed this as a victory for their struggle but warned it was only a first step.

8. Q: Why are protesters not fully trusting the government’s assurance to stop school closures?
A: Leaders like State President Ashwini K.S. are wary of mere verbal promises. They demand the government officially and formally withdraw the administrative order (often referred to as the ‘Hub and Spoke’ model) that enables the merger and closure of schools, ensuring the policy is dead, not just the announcement of it.

9. Q: What broader vision for education does AIDSO advocate for beyond stopping closures?
A: Beyond immediate demands, AIDSO calls for a broader restructuring of education to be scientific, secular, and democratic. They oppose the commercialization and privatization of education, arguing it is an anti-people policy that excludes the poor and suppresses critical thinking.

10. Q: What was the final official action taken at the protest?
A: Smt. Anita Nazare, the Director of the Primary Education Department, accepted the 50 lakh signatures on behalf of the government. A formal memorandum detailing the demands—to fill teacher vacancies, upgrade infrastructure, and officially scrap the closure policy—was submitted to her.

Loading

News Desk
the authorNews Desk

Leave a Reply